That's the same breakthrough like that one from 20 years ago ?

On Thursday, 12 December 2024 at 18:17:26 UTC+2 PGC wrote:

> From Neven's blog, who thinks Quantum Computing supports MWI indirectly: 
> https://blog.google/technology/research/google-willow-quantum-chip/ 
>
> The key argument linking Google's results to MWI is this: Quantum error 
> correction assumes the universal applicability of unitary evolution, the 
> cornerstone of quantum mechanics under MWI.The increasing fidelity of error 
> correction as systems scale, suggests that quantum effects persist 
> robustly, even in larger, more complex systems. This bolsters the 
> plausibility that the universe operates as a fully quantum system without 
> invoking wavefunction collapse. If the multiverse exists as described by 
> MWI, then the success of large-scale quantum computing is a natural 
> consequence, as each computation's branching outcomes correspond to the 
> different branches of the multiverse.
>
> The argument is indirect and circumstantial but noteworthy. While it does 
> not "prove" MWI, it aligns with MWI's predictions, making the 
> interpretation not as implausible as many make it out to be.
>
> In collapse interpretations, decoherence explains why superpositions 
> appear to "choose" classical outcomes. Quantum error correction could still 
> function as long as the system avoids collapse during computation and 
> decoherence is managed. The coherence between qubits would then represent 
> potential states rather than actual branches. Probabilistic Framework 
> Collapse interpretations could argue that error correction succeeds because 
> the physical system probabilistically maintains coherence during 
> operations. Measurement is avoided until after computation, so the qubits 
> remain in their superposed states (potentially explained as amplitudes of 
> possibility rather than branches of reality).
>
> Copenhagen might require ad hoc explanations to justify why quantum error 
> correction apparently aligns with the formalism of the wavefunction, even 
> when interpreted as merely a tool for probabilistic prediction rather than 
> a real, branching entity. Error correction often operates automatically, 
> with no human observer collapsing the system. Collapse interpretations 
> would have to clarify how coherence is maintained and errors are corrected 
> without invoking an observer.
>
> It appears more straightforward with MWI (Warning: I am not MWI 
> proponent/advocate): The redundancy encoded in error correction exists 
> across all branches, with amplitudes adjusted to represent error-free 
> computations. No "collapse" mechanism is required; the wavefunction evolves 
> deterministically according to Schrödinger's equation. The observed 
> outcomes (error-free computations) are a result of constructive 
> interference within the multiverse. As quantum computers like Google's 
> Willow chip demonstrate increasing coherence and error correction efficacy, 
> they indirectly support interpretations like MWI that treat the 
> wavefunction as real and universal. This support comes not as 
> convincing/direct proof of MWI but through Occam: MWI requires fewer 
> additional assumptions than collapse theories to account for the observed 
> success of quantum error correction.
>
> On Tuesday, December 10, 2024 at 2:52:45 PM UTC+1 John Clark wrote:
>
>> Explore this gift article from The New York Times. You can read it for 
>> free without a subscription.
>>
>> Quantum Computing Inches Closer to Reality After Another Google 
>> Breakthrough
>>
>> Google unveiled an experimental machine capable of tasks that a 
>> traditional supercomputer could not master in 10 septillion years. (That’s 
>> older than the universe.)
>>
>>
>> https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/09/technology/google-quantum-computing.html?unlocked_article_code=1.gU4.HQ6B.CrWBbQsS0o0t&smid=em-share
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/eb069e09-3b1d-4c99-ac42-571b3058c923n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to