On Wednesday, February 12, 2025 at 2:09:58 AM UTC-7 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le mer. 12 févr. 2025, 09:55, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a écrit : If the age of the universe is finite, which is generally believed, then no matter how fast it expands, it can never become spatially infinite, So,* IF* it is spatially infinite, this must have been its initial condition at or around he time of the Big Bang (BB). But this contradicts the assumption that it was at a super high temperature at or around the time of the BB. AG, your assumption that a finite-age universe must be spatially finite is flawed. If the universe is infinite now, it was infinite at the Big Bang, That's what I wrote. AG just in a much hotter and denser state everywhere. The Big Bang wasn’t an explosion from a point I didn't assume that. What it actually is, or was, we don't know. But at that time it was hugely denser and hotter than at present. AG but a transition from an extremely dense, uniform state, which applies whether the universe is finite or infinite. Eternal inflation suggests the universe was already infinite before the Hot Big Bang phase. Sure, provided eternal inflation is occurring, but it's speculative, as is my conclusion. Most cosmologists believe it was smaller in the past than at present, as implied by present day expanson run in reverse. AG The observable universe was once small and dense, but the entire universe could have been infinite at all times. Yes, COULD HAVE BEEN. I assumed, for the sake of argument, that it COULD NOT HAVE *BECOME* INFINITE IN FINITE TIME, and THEN inferred what that implied; namely, that it became infinite at the time of the BB. Also, if you believe in the Cosmological Principle, if the observable universe was finite, then so was the entire universe.AG Spatial flatness doesn’t imply finiteness I didn't assume it does. In fact, I assumed the reverse, as do cosmologists. I don't object to your criticisms, but you seem to be reading me with a jaundiced eye. AG —flat, infinite universes expanding from a dense state are fully consistent with general relativity. Does my conjecture conflict with GR, or is it also consistent? AG There’s no contradiction between a spatially infinite universe and high density at early times. The problem isn’t with cosmology—it’s with your mistaken assumption that high density requires finiteness. My assumption isn't necessarily mistaken. Rather, it's another possibility. AG Quentin IOW, if we run the clock backward, the universe seems to get incredibly small, and for *this reason* incredibly hot, roughly analogous to a highly compressed gas. Therefore, it cannot have a flat global geometry, since such a geometry is infinite in spatial extent. QED. AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/81398d3e-4195-4c46-b3b4-094812dd5898n%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/81398d3e-4195-4c46-b3b4-094812dd5898n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3a5dcdb8-3059-4dd3-aefa-a14e887dc851n%40googlegroups.com.
