On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 12:09 PM Russell Standish <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:01:11AM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > > > On 2/24/2025 6:09 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > > > Your claim that "one observer per branch" follows directly from > unitary > > evolution is an assumption, not a derivation. > > > > > > No, it is a straightforward derivation from the formalism. If you don't > > understand that, it is just further confirmation of the fact that you > > understand very little about quantum mechanics. > > Not at all - it is an assumption you're making, and the nub of the entire > argument between you and Quentin. > If you don't see it as a derivation from unitary QM and Everett's ideas then you are missing something important about quantum mechanics. Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLR3c5nC%2BMFqtgmgP9vdsK5xjmVyv4x7CdzGqFiAYyn01g%40mail.gmail.com.
