The full-name is a / separated name, but it doesn't start with /. i.e. you might have a folderinfo like:
fi = { .name = "evolution"; .full_name = "Inbox/evolution"; }; full_name's last path component will relate to the .name -> but may also be translated for different languages (it is up to the backend to do this). It is never used to calculate any backend paths, only the full_name is. So, because of this, the full_name could be completely separated from the display name, it just has to have the right number of levels in it, and it has to be persistent. i.e. you could probably just use the 'entryid' directly (i'm assuming it is a persistent unique identifier), or add it to the path component, or do fat-style munging. Or you could use a different top-level namespace. The only problem with this is cosmetic - the full_name is often used when displaying folder paths in various places, so a purely numerical path may look strange. I don't know if the connector even worries about this? On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 14:06 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: > Hi, > > Are folder names absolute path names in unix convention starting from > the top folder, e.g.: > > "/Inbox/evolution" > > ?? > > Thanks, > jules > > > _______________________________________________ > Evolution-hackers mailing list > Evolution-hackers@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers -- adfa(evolution-2.4:20087): gtkhtml-WARNING **: cannot find icon: 'stock_insert-url' in gnome _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers