On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 21:49 +0000, JP Rosevear wrote: > On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 15:03 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I discovered last week that there is an attempt to resurrect libical > > from non-maintainership, merge all of the patches from various forks, > > and start making sane releases again[1]. Are the evolution team as > > whole interested in merging their changes to libical upstream and > > depending on it to be installed when a release is made with all of the > > relevant changes? libical isn't exactly a small library, and statically > > linking it is a waste of memory for everyone. > > I vaguely recall the biggest diff being timezone handling. > > > I'll happily start working on extracting the changes to EDS and pushing > > them into the new libical repository, if the Evolution team as a whole > > agrees that the fork of libical will be dropped. > > I'd suggested waiting to see a pattern of stable releases before moving > externally, but getting the patches upstream would be good.
Sounds very reasonable to me. -Srini. > > -JP _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers