On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 15:34 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > Because of this earthquake, I would like to hear from others their > opinion. Maybe we overlooked some option in introspection (there is > preferred to create introspection based on code annotations, not to > define them by hand), but I'm afraid the most of the projects like > SyncEvolution, whether it'll be able to handle such change gracefully. > I'd appreciate any opinion on the subject.
I think a fully introspectable calendaring API based on libical could be valuable in a wider context than just for Evolution-Data-Server. I suggest doing this as a stand-alone library -- libical-glib perhaps -- so it could be developed and tested independently of EDS. Then when the library reaches a sufficiently complete and well-tested stage, we could begin porting Evolution and EDS to it on branches, and make a lot of public noise about the imminent changes, and offer assistance to known EDS clients like GNOME Shell and Yorba's California project. Not unlike what we did with the massive libedataserver changes a couple years ago. That might not leave much left for libecal apart from ECalClient and maybe some EDS-specific utilities, but I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. Matt _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
