On Thu, 2019-05-16 at 09:05 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-hackers wrote: > On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 15:49 -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > gnutls Add support for timeouts on GnuTLS pulls > > > > So if you apply that on top of 2.54.1, the test programme works > > again. > > Hi, > do you see from the server logs whether the patched code tried TLS > v1.3, and then v1.2? I'm only wondering.
My expectation based on the patch is that 1.3 is negotiated successfully. I tested against googlemail.com (so no server logs). I've currently got an email user out travelling who can't upgrade until I get the machine back, so I can't test on my server until they come back on Friday to avoid breaking them. > After re-reading the previous messages in this thread, you found that > the development version 2.55.2 works fine. As it's a development > version, the (usual) distributions may pick the stable version, > 2.56.0 or later. Or they can find which patch fixed it between 2.55.1 > and 2.55.2 and backport only that one (you referenced that change > above). openSUSE has chosen the backport to 2.54.1 route. > Thinking of it, maybe it's a nonsense to ask them about the TLS > version downgrade on the fly. My "suggestion" would be over- > complicated. > > In any case, thank you for your time and help on this. You're welcome, Regards, James _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
