On 10 Jun 2001 19:47:09 -0500, Matthew Vanecek wrote:
> The configure script expects to find either libdb.a or libdb3.a. I
> guess it's a simple enough matter to create a symlink, but IMHO,
> Evolution should bow to the o'erwhelming pressure of distribution
> differences and support everybody! (Thats' a joke, BTW). Here's the
> config.log stuff for Evo:
Yeah, I need to add a check for libdb-3.1.a. Sorry that's not there
yet. Would you be willing to test it if I do?
> You either need to rebuild db3 (I believe that was Ettore's advice in
> the first place), or make appropriate symlinks so that libdb.a or
> libdb3.a exist. Having tried to rebuild Redhat's db3 rpm, and then
> successfully having built sleepycat's db3 tarball, I suggest the same
> thing. Get db-3 from sleepycat and rebuild. You gotta do two builds,
> though--one to build the statics, and then another configure/make to
> build the dynamics. It's in the docos. that way.
You don't need to build the dynamic versions to get evolution to use it.
Evolution only requires the static libraries. And since you can just
install into any prefix and point evolution there, there's no reason to
build the dynamic versions.
Thanks,
Chris
_______________________________________________
evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
