On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 03:32, Not Zed wrote: > FWIW we were thinking of splitting camel up into two parts which might > make it more palatable for other parts of the code. > > - one that essentially implements mime, the basics (streams etc), plus > utilities. it would be self contained + glib > - one that implements folders/stores/providers, and possibly > extensions (like ssl streams) and other network related stuff. > could this be put in e-d-s?
It could, but it seems to make more sense to have it a separate library. Might have a chance of more external interest and use, and the code is pretty different from anything else in eds.
