well, I could have sworn I fixed this in 1-4-branch a while back. Maybe it didn't make it into 1.4.5 tho?
Jeff On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 13:52, Radek Doul�k wrote: > On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 11:26 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > Radek: you seem to be discussing 1.5, while Bill seems to be talking > > about 1.4 > > > > which branch is the bug actually in? > > I guess the bug is in both branches (I checked 1.5.x) Only the protocol > name changed? (cid: --> em-no-cid:) > > Radek > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers > _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
