On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 14:03 -0500, Jeffrey Harris wrote: > >>yes, we've got latest libical (from some months ago) integrated into > >>evolution sources. We use it for calendar and tasks. > > > > We'd like to move away from it though for the reasons you list above. > > Have you had problems with the existing implementation? > > I haven't found any projects out there that look like they're trying to > replace libical, and I haven't heard any (recent) complaints about > libical. It's just odd that the code's numbered 0.2.4 and it hasn't > changed much lately. > > Probably if the code was labeled 1.0.1, I'd be happy. I'm guessing that > if Evolution is using it heavily, it's probably production quality code > at this point. Is that true?
Well cvs had a serious problem converting times based on zones, i went back to the routines we wrote the prior version for that. The memory management in the lib is awful with a temporary ring buffer hack. In general it basically works though. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
