On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 10:26 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > Would it be possible to include my patch, though? You do have the > openssl support, you just don't build it by default. So you might as > well have a working openssl support and not build it by default...
Did you check the 1.5 source tree? 1.4 series will probably be doomed to /dev/null when 2.0 is released (hopefully soon) so your patch will be mostly useless (as it is now -- sorry for being so straight, really). And AFAIK, 2.0 is feature-frozen and your patch would wait for 2.2 branch anyway. -- Enver ALTIN | http://skyblue.gen.tr/ Software developer @ Parkyeri | http://www.parkyeri.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
