maybe, but we pretty much only care about linux and solaris and both of those have it... so :)
Jeff On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 00:19, Not Zed wrote: > FWIW this (the updated one) is now in 2.8 branch, and shlould be in > head by the end of the day. > > I'm betting by the end of next week we'll have some ArcaneUnix 5.1 > portability bug reports, sigh. > > On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 10:06 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > Lads, > > > > I was wondering if you could check the patch attached to: > > > > http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=47821 > > > > Apparently there are some build issues on redhat 9 - i'm waiting for > > dobey to mail me the error. > > > > Some of the guys have been running it for a week or so with no > > problems, so we're looking at putting it into 2.0.1 real soon now > > and given its size and its portability issues, I wanted to make sure > > we didn't hit an explosion of portability issues - although really > > we're only concerned with modern distros at this point. > > > > We're actually thinking of removing support for systems without > > getaddrinfo entirely, the emulation code is always going to be a > > pain to maintain and the redefinition of system structures prone to > > portability issues (and i really don't want to have to abstract all > > the structures behind camel- or e-versions). > > > > Thanks, > > Michael > > -- > > Michael Zucchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "born to die, live to work, it's > all downhill from here" > Novell's Evolution and Free > Software Developer _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
