Actually I used this flags, as I wrote in the message :-) On day Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 04:14:10PM +0800, Not Zed wrote what follows: > is it compiled with debugging enabled? -g on the command line to gcc. > Also no optimisation or -O0 aids gdb's accuracry wrt stack traces and > particularly local variables. > > On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 17:54 +0200, Filip Kalinski wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm using current evolution from CVS, built with flags "-O0 -ggdb". > When I try to debug it with gdb (with breakpoint on > "em_folder_tree_create_folder"), gdb cannot print call stack corectly: > > [code] > Breakpoint 2, (=, =, =) at :2356 > 2356 struct _EMFolderTreePrivate *priv = emft->priv; > (gdb) bt > #0 (=, =, =) at :2356 > #1 in (=, =, =) at :182 > #2 in () from > #3 in () from > #4 in () from > #5 in () > #6 in () > #7 in () > #8 in () > #9 in () from > #10 in () from > #11 in () > #12 in () from > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) > [/code] > > What can be reason for this? > > gcc 3.4.1 > gdb 6.1.1 > glibc 2.3.3 > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
-- Filip Kaliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
