Re: [Evolution-hackers] calendar EPlugin plans

[Not Zed]

We very much need the unified account thing, don't we.

> Strange, I thought that was the entire point of allof the new code in
> 2.0, i.e. ESource vs ShellFolder or whatever it was.

It was, the main issue here is that the "group" contains the base uri
and the "source" the relative bit.  This makes a number of things
awkward.  The entire source list should still be associated with a type,
ie "calendars" or "tasks" and the source should be associated with a
particular uri type (for the backends like "webcal") and the groups
should be come just organizing structures for the sources so the user
can re-arrange them.  Not sure how viable this is for 2.2 though.


-JP

-- Michael Zucchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "born to die, live to work, it's all downhill from here" Novell's Evolution and Free Software Developer

<<attachment: zed-48.small.jpg>>