On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 12:01 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 02:30 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 06:28 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > > > > > > IIRC, we talked the other day about having a new notification from the > > > > backends to the clients (notify_needs_authentication, or notify_error > > > > with a specific error code that marks the NEEDS_AUTHENTICATION part), > > > > and so have the client re-call the _open method. How does that sound? > > > > any other idea you have came to? > > > Isn't that what it does already? Its a pity it can't ask for a password > > > based on key. > > > > > not the calendar backends, they get the username/password in the _open > > call. And the password is obtained on the client part :( > Hmm, but don't you know you need it from a failed open? > well, we really don't, we retry the _open call when it fails. The client is responsible of getting the password and sending it to the backends. -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
