On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 17:14 +0530, Not Zed wrote: > On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 21:34 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 13:53 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 11:53 +0530, Not Zed wrote: > > > > Could you try the attached patch to camel? It removes most of the > > > > one-at-a-time stuff from the core camel objects. > > > > > > > > It might make a difference, or it might not - there patches of code in > > > > mail which might need similar treatment. > > > > > > The patch did not seem to make a difference. Here's a full backtrace. > > > > As a matter of fact, the patch causes Evolution to consume 100% of the > > CPU. It would appear that the locking is still buggy. I'll post more > > info if I can get it. > > I wonder where. Its probably that the patch is buggy
Actually I don't think your patch was the problem. Seems to have been a gtkhtml issue. Lee _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
