On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 15:35, iain wrote: > > In the current framework this is not possible -- but the patch moves us > > even further away from the objective. :-) > > Well, the shell could change the setting each time...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think there'd be a race condition here. Jeff > > > So my question is: why do we need to have mail_session_init() called > > before owner_set()? Can we still make the summary work without making > > this a requirement? > > I've no idea, but mail_tool_uri_to_folder was failing because the > session wasn't initialised, if the summary got started before the > mailer. > > iain > -- > "No offence to them, but forty years from now, > who's going to remember the Chemical Brothers?" - Steve Vai > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers > -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
