On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 00:58, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 01:22, Not Zed wrote: > > Yeah i did something similar when purifying and quantifying on the > > Solaris box - I thought >20% of total cpu for initialising 64 objects > > was a bit much, I guess the timing/scheduling is different enough on > > solaris to make the algorithm really not work well. > > I think on Linux we just use /dev/random, that's why you don't need the > patch.
Yeah it does, i know that. But the algorithm would've been written on a free unix, which is probably why they didn't realise how much it sucked. > > I wonder who this should go to ... > > Michael Meeks, who now maintains ORBit. Unfortunately (for us :)) he is > on his honey moon now, so we should probably just try to get the patch > into the Ximian packages for now. Ok. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
