> In the future, if you guys could allow users to define sequences of
> "actions", exactly as in filters, and allow them to be applied to
> messages via adding the sequence's (macro's?) name to the "tools" menu,
> and maybe optionally a labeled button in the toolbar, this could be cool
> also.

No.

The s-exp stuff used in the filter code was never designed to be a
general purpose language, even though with a little work it could
implement an inefficient scheme-like language.

If scripting is to be done, it needs to be done properly, as an
extension language, and it has to be powerful enough to replace a lot of
the existing code (e.g. like reply to list, mark all as read, etc).

Although once implemented, a filter-like user interface could be an
option, but underneath it needs to work properly.



_______________________________________________
evolution-hackers maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Reply via email to