On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 09:16, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 16:08, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > > The right value for GNOME_PATH is something like > > > > /opt/evolution:/usr > > I don't remember if this ever got fixed; but as I recollect, the > gnome-config script [ highly cunningly ], parsed the 'path' backwards > last time I checked. Thus possibly: > > /usr:/opt/evolution > > would be better - that is, unless it's been fixed ;-) [ I forget > whether oaf parses it the right way round or not ].
AFAIK it never got fixed, but it doesn't matter. :-) > I imagine doing development on a different prefix with the -devel RPMs > for the same packages installed is rather an optimistic suggestion. I was not assuming that the libraries would be installed twice. -- Ettore Perazzoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
