On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 21:34 +0100, guenther wrote: < Snipped > > > So this is a big issue, currently on HEAD, we have either the "Junk" or > > the "Not Junk" button, based on wether the messages has been marked junk > > or not. We actually needs to discuss this further. Am CCing Srini for > > his comments on this. > > Revert that commit immediately. > > This is a bad idea. Really. All you gain is a few pixels in the toolbar. > But if this UI change is introduced in 2.6, it will be harder for the > developers and confusing to the users to get the other button in again.
I'm inclined to agree with guenther. This sounds like a big usability problem that needs to be addressed. Toolbar buttons should NOT simply "go away" within the same general view, IMO. This is a usability thing that was learned by most vendors long ago. Gray-it-out if you must, but don't make it disappear. > Questions regarding "Junk filtering not working" majorly impacted by a > badly (if at all) trained Bayes are common these days. To make SA more > effective, the user needs to train Bayes. So there *must* be a way to > train it. The user has to be able to make SA learn *any* mail marked as > either Ham or Spam previously. I absolutely agree. This is one of the most important functions of an E-mail client these days, beyond actually retrieving the mail and displaying it. It must work effectively. Just my two cents. ~ Greg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
