On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 22:01 -0600, Mark Pinto wrote: > Kernel 2.6.8. glibc 2.3.6. I'm convinced that it's an evolution > issue (2.4, but I tested and have the same problem on 2.6), as I have > 2+G files on this computer that are handled fine.
Evo 2.4.2.1 *definitely* has 2GB file size issues. Attached is the error message I get while trying to attach a 2.5GB file. So, it's quite reasonable to expect that Evo has other small-file bugs in it's code base. > On 3/27/06, Greg Tassone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 20:06 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 16:48 -0800, Greg Tassone wrote: > > ... > > > > The other problem could be that your system is missing large file > > > > support. How old is your kernel? > > > > > > LFS came in during the *early* 2.4 kernels. *Nobody* (except a > > > few m68k retro-geeks, and they mostly use 2.4.2x) uses such old > > > kernels and glibc/libc6 anymore. > > > > Agreed. This is compounded by the fact that XFS support probably > > indicates a later version as well. > > > > However, history around this list has taught me to NEVER take anything > > for granted. I can't believe how old some of the stuff is that we hear > > about on this list (e.g., VERY old RedHat Linux installs, very old > > versions of Evo, old kernels, etc.). > > > > Therefore, I decided to at least ask the question, given the somewhat > > strange/rare circumstances of the error. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA "The warning message we sent the Russians was a calculated ambiguity that would be clearly understood." Alexander Haig
_______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
