On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 13:13 -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote: > On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:13:28 +0100 > "Reinhard Brandstaedter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 20:39 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > >> hi reinhard, > >> > >> Am Donnerstag, den 02.11.2006, 13:56 +0100 schrieb Reinhard > >> Brandstaedter: > >> > What information is used for threading if i don't use the fall back > >> > method by subject. Maybe the information is stripped by groupwise > >> > or > >any > >> > virus scanner? > >> > >> Evolution supports "References:" and "In-Reply-To:" headers. > >> "Thread-*" headers are Microsoft's proprietary headers and not > >> supported. > > > >It seems to me exactly this doesn't happen! > >If I switch OFF "Fall back to threading messages by subject" I don't > >get threads at all! > >I only get threads when this option is switched to ON but if i thread > >by subject it's not correct. > > > >I've checked the mail sources and they contain the correct header > >information. KMail for example threads the messages correct, even if i > >only thread by header information and not Subject. > > > >Reinhard > > > > To get proper threading with a Groupwise backend, you need to use the > IMAP protocol vs. SOAP for connecting to the mail server. There's give > and take here with regard to appointments and such, but I like my > threads, so I start Evo with 'USE_IMAP=1 evolution' > > Try this and see if it's better for you (as long as IMAP is enabled on > that server).
Well that solved my problem for the thread view, thanks a lot. However I have to check if there are problems with appointments this way. What is the reason threading doesn't work via SOAP though? Can this be solved (in a future version maybe?)? Reinhard _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
