I've never used spamassion, but have been very pleased with bogofilter.
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:02 -0400, on behalf of Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 11:24 -0400, Michelle Murrain wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 11:22 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > > > > > You don't need to set it up, but you need to install it, since evo uses > > > spamassassin to filter spam. 2.12 will also have the option to use > > > bogofilter instead of spamassassin. > > > > OK, I got it. Which is better? Bogofilter or spamassassin? > > > > Bogofilter, in my experience. It's not even close. After training, my > spamassassin never got better than 90% catch rate, which is still some > hundred spams a day for me. Bogofilter is 99.9% at least, probably > better. False positive rate is better too. > > Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > Evolution-list mailing list > Evolution-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
