I understand that IMAP will download only the header... what I was asking is that if I enable spam filtering for the Inbox, will Evolution be smart enough to download the entire message in order to check for spam, or will it just not work unless I manually enable the downloading of entire messages. On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 22:20 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 20:38 -0500, Caleb Marcus wrote: > > I've gotten to the point where my email address is in so many places > > online that I get one or two spam messages every day that Gmail > > doesn't catch... when I used POP, SpamAssassin would catch everything, > > but now that I use IMAP, I don't have spam filters applied... if I > > check off the spam filtering in Inbox thingy in teh account settings, > > will it automatically know to download the body, or will it just run > > SpamAssassin on an empty message body? > > I assume it will only download the header, which is why I suggested it. > If Evo junk filtering is off for the Gmail account, it won't > automatically run SpamAssassin for these messages and therefore won't > download the bodies until you decide to read or preview them. Of course > if you hit the Junk button I would expect Evo to download the message > and run SA for learning purposes > > POP is different because the entire message will always be downloaded, > independantly of any filtering. > > poc > > > On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 12:39 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > AFAIK, Evo caches the *headers*, unless you explicitely open the message > > > of course, but note that applying junk filters may also imply > > > downloading message bodies, since both SpamAssasin and Bogofilter do > > > Bayesian analisis of the message text. Since Gmail has its own junk > > > filtering, you might want to disable Evo junk filtering for your Gmail > > > account. In fact Gmail recommends this. > > > > > > Evo has no built-in way to encrypt the cache, though I guess a plugin > > > could be written to do it. As others have said, you can always use other > > > Linux tools for filesystem encryption. > > > > > > poc > > > > > > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 22:20 -0800, Ari El wrote: > > > > Recently I discovered gmail's new IMAP feature. The next minute I was > > > > setting > > > > evolution up to access my gmail account. I noticed evo's google/imap > > > > account > > > > cached thousand of messages (some headers, some full messages), and also > > > > found that the cache is made persistent even with me *not* selecting > > > > "mark > > > > for offline reading". Meaning that if I close evo, then reopen, at > > > > first I > > > > get asked for the imap server password, but even if I dont enter it, I > > > > can > > > > see the full local cache of the imap folders and all recent message > > > > contents. > > > > > > > > I don't like this. > > > > > > > > Is there a way to force evo to encrypt the local cache (imap account and > > > > also the exchage account if possible), so that I get asked for a > > > > password to > > > > open the local cache (or better, the default gnome keyring could be > > > > used)? > > > > any hint on how to do this? > > > > > > > > TIA > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Evolution-list mailing list > > > Evolution-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list > > _______________________________________________ > > Evolution-list mailing list > > Evolution-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
