On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:26 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 12:07 -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 11:30 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On 09/29/2009 10:56 AM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > > > What about a move to trash allure? Seems like that might satisfy > > > > Everyone's concern...Sometimes the technically correct choice isn't > > > > always practical;-) > > > You'll have to explain that. I don't know what you mean by "trash allure". > > Just make the Trash folder act like the search folders. So you're > > keeping the mark for deletion style but a copy(linkto the msg) is > > visible in the "Trash" folder. This way you're not changing any > > protocol or technology applied, your just playing with the way deleted > > messages are seen...just a thought. > > > 1.) Wouldn't fix the issue for people who use multiple MUAs. > 2.) Deleted messages in what folders would be included in the Trash > search folder? Just INBOX, all personal folder, or all folders > [including shared]? Even just all-personal could get > really-frackin-huge; I know I wouldn't be too thrilled about a mail > client that enumerated the contents of every folder I had access to.
As I said before, *this is what Evo already does*. See for example http://www.go-evolution.org/FAQ#Why_do_I_have_two_Trash_folders_for_the_same_account.3F and http://www.go-evolution.org/FAQ#I_deleted_a_bunch_of_mail_but_my_mailbox_is_just_as_big_as_before._Why.3F poc _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
