On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:39 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 13:46 +0000, Tom Davies wrote: > > It's not really Ubuntu's fault that Gnome craziness that has sent > > several forks of Gnome spinning off, such as Mate or Cinamon. > > Ermm, what have Mate and Cinnamon to do with packaging Evolution for > Ubuntu, and Ubuntu's PPAs? > Free and open source is there to fork. It's part of the concept. > > Maybe more ontopic would be > "It's not GNOME's fault if $yourdistro has either not enough manpower to > find packagers, or if $yourdistro has also forked or replaced so many > components in the stack that it has gotten way harder for volunteers to > compile and package the upstream tarball"? Thought of that? :)
Or that those 'volunteers' feel that the older version in the official repository is more stable than current 'stable'. Regards, Peter Hurley _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
