Am Freitag, den 17.05.2013, 09:29 +0100 schrieb Pete Biggs: > > > > > > To be honest most of the grouching about the stability and speed of Evo > > > seems to be coming from Ubuntu users > > > > Or people with *unbelievably* ancient versions. Every time I see > > someone complaining about 2.32 or even 2.28... my jaw drops. I just > > don't get it - why do that to yourself? > > As others have said, these are the versions on current *supported* > distros. Specifically RHEL 5 (and consequently CentOS 5, Scientific > Linux 5 etc.) is on Evolution version 2.12.3; RHEL 6 (and clones) is on > 2.28.3. > > The whole point of RHEL is stability, not cutting edge, consequently > they stick to versions of software that are consistent and they back > port bug fixes where appropriate. To be honest I've never had any > complaints from my users about the instability or speed of Evolution on > CentOS 5 or 6 (but that may be more to do with my users!). > > BTW, the use of 2.32.x versions is because that's the last version > before Gnome 3 came out - so those distros that don't like Gnome 3 (and > I've never understood why) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ galore users wouldn't like gnome3 ??? I do ! -- Thomas Prost <thomas.pr...@prosts.info> ProstsInfo
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
