On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 17:11 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > Please reply to the mailing list instead of sending private answers, and > please consider marking quoted text as such (easier to read).
Argh, I'm sorry. So much for reading the recipients list correctly. > On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 11:15 -0430, CAMACHO G. Lizzet J SIDOR wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 09:25 -0430, CAMACHO G. Lizzet J SIDOR wrote: > > > I work in a venezuelan company that just replaced Outlook mail client > > > with Evolution 3.4.4. We're looking for a complement or plugin for > > > Evolution, as sustitute of an Exchange/Outlook 2003 custom form, which > > > allows the users to send a mail message with 2 primary attributes: > > > > > > * It allows the users to add response without modifying previous > > > messages. > > > > What does that mean? Adding a comment locally, without sending a reply? > > If so, that's currently not supported by Evolution. > > Not sure what "modifying" previous messages means either, because > > Evolution does not allow altering received messages. > > > > When the users are replying/forwarding a message, our Outlook custom form > > doesn't allow the users to modify the text of the old messages inserted into > > the new message. I don't think that is possible (and I fail to see a valid usecase anyway - the message text of the old message is already in the old message that you could still save, so why care what the new message quotes). > > > * It displays a custom made attribute with the information of the > > > sequence of previous senders and dates, as you can see in the attach > > > image (Audit trail). > > > > Isn't that what you have in the Message-ID, References, In-Reply-To > > headers of every message anyway? Or is that locally stored information, > > outside of the message? > > > > Certainly, the information is displayed in the header of every message. > > But the custom field displays the summary sequence of thread messages's > > headers > > in one field, it's stored in the message. You could probably display the headers more visibly by hacking the code, but doesn't sound like a very common usecase either to me. andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
