On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 21:19 +0000, Justin Musgrove wrote:
> In the message rules, is there a equivalent to an "OR" statement
> within a condition?
>
> CentOS 7, Evo 3.8.5 "EWS"
Hi,
not for your version, but the upcoming 3.16.0 has so called "Free form
expressions" where you can combine 'and', 'or' and 'not' subparts.
There might be a user manual entry for it, but at least the bug report
link:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550796#c10
> Sender: Contains: email address
> Subject: Contains: Schedule OR Plan OR Docket OR Program OR Agendum
This might look like:
All conditions are met
[ Sender ] [contains] [email]
[ Free form expression ] [ or:(s:Schedule s:Plan s:Docket s:Program
s:Agendum) ]
Alternatively, both as a free form expression only:
and:(f:"email" or:(s:Schedule s:Plan s:Docket s:Program s:Agendum))
Anyway, this is 3.16.0+ material, making things easier.
Your version supports expressions too, but of a different syntax (not
much different, but still). Make your filter rule look like:
All conditions are met
[ Sender ] [contains] [email]
[ Expression ] [ or((header-contains "Subject" "Schedule") (header-contains
"Subject" "Plan") (header-contains "Subject" "Docket") (header-contains
"Subject" "Program") (header-contains "Subject" "Agendum")) ]
Bye,
Milan
_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
