On 2017-03-14 at 09:54 +0000, Pete Biggs wrote: > If digests are kept, are other mitigations possible. Like: > > Is there a way to enforce mime digests? > > And is there a way to make the boilerplate at the top of the > digest more "robust" on the issue of replying to a digest? > > Is it possible to use References: headers to send all digest > replies to moderation? > These are some digest Message-IDs: mailman.18.1489579205.7551.evolution-l...@gnome.org mailman.19.1489579205.7551.evolution-l...@gnome.org
a search for References: *mailman.*.evolution-list@gnome.org should probably do it. Given that the email received should already have a Message-ID, I expect few false positives. It is possible that in some cases the incoming email didn't include a Message-ID and was added by gnome MTA, but those shouldn't contain the mailman substring. The only false positives I'm coming up with is for someone purposefully an mailmain administrativia into the mailing list (eg. he is quoting the list Welcome message to point out a typo) > Is it technically possible to remove the ability to turn on > digests, but allow current users to keep receiving them? Hiding the UI at the subscription step may be enough. You could hide it at the user preferences too if you want to be more stubborn about it. This would require editing server files, so no, I don't think there's a mailman preference that can be readily used per list. Cheers _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
