On Wed, 10 May 2017 15:15:24 +0200
Milan Crha <mc...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 13:18 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > I think you meant to say "Arch Linux has corrected their packaging
> > error" since I don't think any code in either Evolution or libsoup
> > was "patched".  
> 
>       Hi,
> libsoup had been patched. The 2.58.1 has reverted offending commit
> which "broke evolution-ews" in 2.58.0.
> 
> The other issue about missing symbol from libsoup in webkitgtk+ looks
> like a packaging issue, though rather installed version mismatch to me.
> It was most likely caused by the downgrade of libsoup to 2.56.0, before
> the 2.58.1 release happened (there was no other option before 2.58.1
> release, except of patching 2.58.0 manually, but in that time it was
> unknown what exactly broke evolution-ews).
> 
> That said, it's likely that updating libsoup to the latest upstream
> release, which is 2.58.1, would fix all the issues Arch users reported
> here in the two/three recent threads including this one. More info
> about missing libsoup symbol in webkitgtk+ in the other thread.
>       Bye,
>       Milan
> 

Yes, with the latest libsoup and rebuilt packages of Evolution, the Arch 
packages seem to be working again now.. :)
The only problem still, is the number of unread behind the folder names not 
getting updated...

BTJ
_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to