Am Sonntag, den 04.08.2019, 11:31 +0100 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> On Sun, 2019-08-04 at 08:06 +0200, Volker Wysk wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 04.08.2019, 00:05 +0100 schrieb Patrick
> > O'Callaghan:
> > > On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 23:55 +0200, Volker Wysk wrote:
> > > > Am Samstag, den 03.08.2019, 22:45 +0100 schrieb Patrick
> > > > O'Callaghan:
> > > > > On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 23:21 +0200, Volker Wysk wrote:
> > > > > > > > So your suggestion is to change the IMAP protocol and
> > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > IMAP
> > > > > > > > servers implement the change. Good luck with that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No. I'm just trying to make things clear.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'd suggest, is that evolution should just ignore the
> > > > > > > server's
> > > > > > > response ("invalid id") in the context which we have
> > > > > > > here,
> > > > > > > since
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > be perfectly okay, and not be a server-side error.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I mean, evolution should ignore the server's response and
> > > > > > cancel
> > > > > > what
> > > > > > it was about to do. Of course it can't just continue, after
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > "invalid id" response has happened.
> > > > >
> > > > > So to repeat what I already said: you're proposing that
> > > > > Evolution
> > > > > should ignore a server-side error on the supposition that it
> > > > > might
> > > > > not
> > > > > be an error.
> > > >
> > > > I wouldn't call the server's response an error.
> > >
> > > We're going round in circles. The server responds with an error
> > > because
> > > it *IS AN ERROR*. It was asked for a message which it doesn't
> > > have.
> > > That is an error. It doesn't matter that this was caused by a
> > > different
> > > client deleting the message, because the server is not designed
> > > to
> > > tell
> > > one client what another client is doing, and the IMAP protocol is
> > > not
> > > designed to enable clients to cooperate with each other. Putting
> > > it
> > > bluntly, if your setup is doing this then your setup is wrong,
> > > and if
> > > you don't like it then you need to get a change included in the
> > > IMAP
> > > definition.
> >
> > It's time to stop this conversation.
>
> One last thing: it's fine to discuss these things here but nothing
> will
> happen unless you also register it on the Evolution Gitlab page
> (assuming you mean a change in Evo's behaviour rather than an actual
> change to IMAP). If you do, post the URL here so others can chip in.
Yes, I know. And again: I'm not proposing a change to IMAP.
Bye
Volker
_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
