On Sat, 2022-10-08 at 11:48 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 16:44 -0500, Tim McConnell via evolution-list > wrote: > > > "gdb something --ex r" will just start "something" under the > > > debugger > > > and then let it run until it either exists or crashes. It won't > > > create > > > any files on its own. > > > > > > poc > > [...] > > > Thanks for that information. So other than maybe slightly higher > > CPU/Memory usage it should be fine just to run evolution in gdb > > until > > it breaks again, correct? > > I would think so. The debugger just sets a signal trap, so I wouldn't > expect the CPU usage to change, as Evo will run at normal speed until > something "interesting" happens. > > poc > _______________________________________________ > evolution-list mailing list > evolution-list@gnome.org > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list That's good, it took a week for the segfault to reappear and once again , I have no way of knowing why. it did it after I had the computer running overnight. The only "consistent" thing is I'm prompted to sign into Google Contacts before the crash. Even that makes little sense due to me having don't ask on this device checked. Maybe because I have 2 gmail accounts it's checking(?)but I doubt that, I'm reasonably sure Evolution can get multiple IMAP accounts with no problems. But since it shouldn't be more than just another process to run, I'll just leave evolution in gdb running until it pukes again. -- Tim McConnell <tmcconnell...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Logwatch reports segmentation faults in Evolution
Tim McConnell via evolution-list Sun, 09 Oct 2022 12:27:24 -0700
- Re: [Evolution] Logwatch rep... Tim McConnell via evolution-list
- Re: [Evolution] Logwatch reports... Tim McConnell via evolution-list
- Re: [Evolution] Logwatch rep... Pete Biggs
- Re: [Evolution] Logwatch... Tim McConnell via evolution-list
- Re: [Evolution] Logwatch rep... Milan Crha via evolution-list
- Re: [Evolution] Logwatch... Tim McConnell via evolution-list
- Re: [Evolution] Logwatch reports segmenta... Tim McConnell via evolution-list
- Re: [Evolution] Logwatch reports seg... Patrick O'Callaghan
- Re: [Evolution] Logwatch reports... Tim McConnell via evolution-list
- Re: [Evolution] Logwatch rep... Patrick O'Callaghan
- Re: [Evolution] Logwatch... Tim McConnell via evolution-list
- Re: [Evolution] Log... Patrick O'Callaghan
- Re: [Evolution] Log... Tim McConnell via evolution-list
- Re: [Evolution] Logwatch reports segmenta... Tim McConnell via evolution-list
- Re: [Evolution] Logwatch reports seg... Andre Klapper via evolution-list
- Re: [Evolution] Logwatch reports seg... Milan Crha via evolution-list