On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 07:30, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 15:22, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> > Imagine 10000 imap (evolution) clients of a single server.
> > 
> > I very much do not want all of them sorting on the server.  It makes
> > much more sense to distribute that load across the clients.
> 
> So you want to download the entire set of messages to all 10000 of your
> clients and sort there? I do hope your network can cope with the
> gratuitous extra traffic :)

Please correct me if I'm missing something, but doesn't a sorted list
take the same time to download as an unsorted (or sorted in another way)
list?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to