The question then becomes:  where does this get truncated?  When the
identical original email is "replied to all" via Netscape 7.xx, it sails
though the post office with no trouble.  Could there be a limit to the
length of the recipients list?

Thanks,
Dick


On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 10:35, Dan Winship wrote:
> from the bounce:
> 
> > ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> > 553 5.0.0 "BANNER GERALD P." <ban... Unbalanced '<'
> 
> and then in the message body:
> 
> > Cc: Joe Fischetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Conroy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "O'SHEA DANIEL F." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > "ALUSOW NANCY J." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "PAYNE DANIEL J."
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "STOKES GRANT H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > "BANNER GERALD P." <ban>
> 
> Note the address at the end. It's missing the "@domain" part.
> 
> -- Dan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

_______________________________________________
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Reply via email to