I'm actually trying to find the time to do just that. In order to check it by hand, I've been saving the message source to a file and then verifying that. That's tedious though, so I don't like to do it often. I'll have to look through bugzilla to see if I can find out what the problems were with the old code. It seems to me that this would be easier to check than the MIME signatures, but I may find out the hard way that I'm wrong. ;o)>
-JLa Gregory Leblanc wrote: > The 1.0 series is REALLY old, so hopefully nobody has been discussing it > "recently". Anyway, the code that verified inline signatures seemed to > have some pretty serious bugs, so it was removed. There are details in > bugzilla, though the bugs are probably 'closed' somehow now (so you'll > have to look harder than normal to find them). If it's really fairly > easy, please, send a patch. :) > Greg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
