Okay so it's not official. And like I mentioned I hadn't run into it myself until I was testing a website I developed for a client.
But I've been seeing for of them recently, so it's not a bad idea to add the type sometime in the not so distant future.... On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 01:48, Not Zed wrote: > On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 15:36, Edward Muller wrote: > > Actually there is. :-) > > > > I ran into Windows setting this as a mime type when I was working on a > > web application for a client. > > > > Google for it... > > > > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=pjpeg&btnG=Google+Search > > Uh, but there isn't any such beast at the official mime media types page > at: > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/ > > So is some brain-dead client using a non-registered media type for jpeg > data, without even using the x-atom syntax? > > I always thought progressive jpeg's were just part of a normal jpeg, it > would not require a new media type. > > What is the content-type set to in the part header? > > If its something that has changed with a newer version of evolution, it > sounds more like gnome-vfs or something, since we only (*ever*) support > 'image/jpeg' in our code (among some other image types). > > There is absolutely no way 'this worked in 1.4.0' if it was being > identified as image/pjpeg since the inlinable image types are hardcoded > and hasn't changed for years. -- Edward Muller Interlix (http://www.interlix.com) Phone: 417-862-0573 - Cell: 417-844-2435 - Fax: 417-862-0572 Web Hosting - PC Service & Support - Custom Programming - Network Service & Support Specializing in Open Source Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
