is hitting '.' any less convenient? I'm not sure your idea is a good behaviour or not.
Jeff On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 20:51, Andrew Cowie wrote: > Quick recommendation. If you think this should be "straight forward" > then perhaps tell me where to look, and I'll try and code it myself. > > Situation: > > Viewing a folder, threaded mode, showing deleted messages, no > other sort in place. > > Use Case: > > I am working through a mailing list. > I see a thread I don't want to read, so want to delete it. > I press Ctrl-H to select the thread. > I press DEL to mark it deleted. > > BUT THEN my cursor is at the top most message (where I selected > and pressed Ctrl-H originally) - with a whole stack of deleted > messages I now have to skip past. > > Unhelpful :) > > While I know I can then press ']' to get the next unread > message, it's a bit inconvenient. So: > > Suggestion: > > Would it be possible, following pressing of the DEL button to > mark the thread deleted, to advance the cursor to the next > [unread?] message automatically? > > [I note that if deleted messages aren't visible, then the above > sequence results in the current message cursor just goes away, > period] > > > If this is sensible, I would be happy to lodge this as a bug/feature > request. (I've always considered it impolite to do so without the good > feeling of the developers). > > AfC > Sydney -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
