I already told you: if you don't want to see dot files, then don't
subscribe to them. or delete them off your imap server. I don't care.

Jeff

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 17:03, Scott Otterson wrote:
> Does the spec tell you to display an email if you click on it?  
> 
> No, but this is conventional email client behavior.  If you literally
> implement only what is in the spec, I don't know what you'd have but it
> is certain that nobody could use it.
> 
> Similarly, not showing dotfiles is an IMAP client convention.  People
> expect it, and your client is for people, afterall.
> 
> Scott
> 
> On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 12:12, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > I invite you to read the bloody spec and show me where it says to hide
> > dot files. if you can't find it, then I'm not implementing it. period.
> > 
> > Jeff
> > 
> > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 15:14, Scott Otterson wrote:
> > > If Outlook and Mozilla (>90% of all IMAP clients by user) don't display
> > > dotfiles, then that IS the convention.
> > > 
> > > Evolution isn't following it.
> > >  
> > > Scott
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 12:02, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > > if there was a convention, it would be in the server implementation -
> > > > WHERE IT BELONGS
> > > > 
> > > > Jeff
> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 14:53, Scott Otterson wrote:
> > > > > Unix again...
> > > > > 
> > > > > Outlook and Mozilla -- two of the most popular non-Unix IMAP clients --
> > > > > do not display dotfiles, regardless of what LIST returns.  There's a
> > > > > convention here that evolution isn't following.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Scott
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 11:23, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > > > > hiding dot files is a unix filesystem thing, it is not an imap thing.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > if folders starting with a . were meant to be hidden by imap clients,
> > > > > > then the server simply wouldn't return them in the LIST query, now would
> > > > > > it?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Jeff
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 13:28, Scott Otterson wrote:
> > > > > > > I don't see what the OS has to do with this.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Mozilla and Outlook -- neither of which require Unix -- hide the
> > > > > > > dotfiles.  If two of the most popular IMAP clients handle this situation
> > > > > > > gracefully, then this is starting to look like an OS-independent IMAP
> > > > > > > convention.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Has anybody noticed how other IMAP clients handle dotfiles?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Scott
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 10:07, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > > > > > > imap != unix filesystem
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > period.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Jeff
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 13:06, Scott Otterson wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Well, manually subscribing to a bunch of folders is a way to handle
> > > > > > > > > this. 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > But Mozilla and Outlook are smarter than that... can't evolution be 
> > > > > > > > > too?
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 09:45, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > this is a server issue, not a client issue.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > if your server uses dot files for state info, then it should not be
> > > > > > > > > > listing them when we query for folders.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > however, you *could* simply have evo show only subscribed folders 
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > just not subscribe to the dot folders.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Jeff
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 12:21, Scott Otterson wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Is there a way to set up evolution to not display IMAP status dot
> > > > > > > > > > > folders?
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > The UW IMAP server I'm hooked to has a lot of folders beginning 
> > > > > > > > > > > with a
> > > > > > > > > > > period.  I never look at them because they contain account info, 
> > > > > > > > > > > spam
> > > > > > > > > > > filter status and so on.  They're invisible in the folder views 
> > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > mozilla, outlook express, etc., but they fill up the screen in
> > > > > > > > > > > evolution.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Is there an evolution XML file somewhere that I can change?
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Scott
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> 

_______________________________________________
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Reply via email to