On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 20:15, Ricky wrote: > Tony Earnshaw wrote: > > >The thing is, Mozilla is using pure Bayes (AFAIK) and Evo is using > >SpamAssassin of unknown (to me) heritage (uses Bayes, but SA has a lot > >more besides). My present version is 2.63 and I can do one heck of a lot > >to make it work better for my site than Evo can. > > > >I agree that one should be able to switch it on and off (what's the > >point of having an SA-shooche mail admin and then stuffing the mail > >through someone else's version of one's own thing?) > > > >All in all, I'm not looking forward to moving to 1.5. > > > >--Tonni > > > > > I'd personally like to be able use my the same training.dat from > Thunderbird in Evolution. I mean, it's all ready been trained so well. > ;-) The other thing I've always wondered, and this is kind of related. > In Thunderbird I can label my e-mails, and in Evolution I can label my > e-mails, but why don't they use the same type of labels? (I use IMAP.) > That is, why I can't I label an e-mail important in Evolution and have > Thunderbird recognize it as important as well? Sometimes I have to use > one or the other depending on where I am, and it would be nice if these > things could stay with me regardless. (I assume it's based some sort of > IMAP standard?)
there's no IMAP standard for this. As it turns out, Evolution stores these labels locally and not on the IMAP server (odds are Mozilla does the same). Jeff > > Thanks for the great e-mail client, by the way. ;-) > > Back to lurking, > Ricky 8-) > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
