On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 03:29, Christopher Ness wrote: > 2. I also like that someone has challenged the mentality that Outlook, > Groupwise, etc. where correct in their monolithic program PIM > solutions. I believe that each application _should_ be split into their > own...
Something orthogonal to the points we've had so far just occurred to me: The Nautilus team just redesigned (again, sigh) the way file browsing works - switching to what is, I believe, called "spacial navigation" where each directory is presented with its own window whose desktop position is persistent. Perhaps that's an idea for a future UI direction for evolution? If one wants the addressbook UI, it opens, but in a separate window ... thus making it the "GNOME address book" we've been hypothesizing about. The fact that it's code is supplied by (and branded to, hey cool with that Ximian / Evolution) would be less of an obstacle to people understanding that GNOME had a solid and common (in this case) Address Book tool. AfC Sydney P.S. I would have to agree with someone's comment that whether we like it or not, the term "Evolution" is synonymous with "mail client" in the open source community. -- Andrew Frederick Cowie Operational Dynamics Consulting Pty Ltd Australia: +61 2 9977 6866 North America: +1 646 472 5054 http://www.operationaldynamics.com/ _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
