On tor, 2004-05-27 at 09:56 -0400, Michael C. Neel wrote: > > > I know what spambayes is. > > > > > > > > Quick list of imap filtering: > > > > > > 1. Download message, make it as deleted > > > 2. Check message for spam clues, place results in headers > > > 3. Upload checked version to server > > > 4. Purge deleted message > > > > give me the actual rules. not the made-up-my-own-syntax rules that don't > > correspond to any evolution filter rules. > Jeff, don't bother, it's clear you're not reading my emails. Those > steps are what spambayes does, which I doubt your assertion that you > know about spambayes. As I have said before, there are no evo filter > rules inplace.
Sorry, can't help but answering. Jeff has been very helpful to you. If I were him and got as bad explanation as you've been giving and also the flame-like comments, I would just have ignored you. It's clear you WANT it to be a bug in evo and WANT to mess with people instead of giving good explanations to solve the problem, which is clearly a setup-problem on your side and not a evo bug. Since you can't give a clear explanation of your setup, nobody can help you. > Sorry for wasting your time by pointing out bugs in evo. What bugs? I haven't seen anything in what you say that suggests a bug in evo. /Erik _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
