On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 15:13 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 14:14 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 20:55 +0100, guenther wrote: > > > > > Received: from headcheese.ximian.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by > > > > > lists.ximian.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C231D124917; Tue, > > > > > 11 Jan 2005 06:13:16 -0500 (EST) > > > > > Received: by lists.ximian.com (Postfix, from userid 38) id > > > > > D6BB112437D; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:15:54 -0500 (EST) > > > > > > > > It looks like lists.ximian.com has some choke point. > > > > > > Yeah, and it's likely called "subscription required". ;-) > > > > > > Every now and then posts by non-subscribers are approved and the queue > > > gets flushed, but that needs to be done manually. There are quite a few > > > mails from mid December making its way to the list recently... > > > > Would it be better to configure [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that it > > does not allow non-subscribers to post? > > no, because then we get flooded with spam.
Why would *not* allowing non-subscribers to post get the lists flooded with spam? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "Your opinions are bound to affect the stories you choose to broadcast [on TV/radio]."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
