On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 09:32 +0800, Not Zed wrote: >On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 17:19 -0700, JP Rosevear wrote: >>On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 10:34 +0800, Not Zed wrote: >>> >>> I don't see how any such patch could possibly work very well, so i >>> wouldn't get too excited about it. >> >>Why not? As noted the main thing is the two separate camel sessions. > >Yes, two separate camel sessions. Thats certainly a show-stopper for >this 'working very well', don't you think?
Umm, yes, and thats a) why its not in and b) what I originally stated several messages ago. I thought you were implying there was some additional major issue that I had not already covered. JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
