On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 10:25 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > Is there a particular reason for this? > > Yes there is. Mailing lists aren't supposed to set reply-to. > > If a user has set reply-to it means they specifically want the reply > going to another address than the one they sent it from.
I think there is a better solution. Perhaps reply-to is ok left the way the user sets it. Instead, maybe the list should set the "from" address as being the list, instead of the OP. Then, people who set reply-to's will get them to their correct account, and otherwise, replies will go to the list. Coupled with this, I think the default evolution action when encountering a list should be as follows: "reply" button replies to the "X-BeenThere" or "List-Id" or "List-Post", whichever is the correct one /regardless/ of reply-to. "reply to sender" (an extra button when one of the above headers is encountered) sends either to the OP's "reply-to" address, unless they haven't specified one, in which case it will send to the OP's "from" address. But unless otherwise specified, "reply" for a list, should definitely go to the list. -- Iain Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
