On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 23:25 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 10:35 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:46 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > > > > > > /me wondering only. > > > /me also wishes to know if Evo will only day support or divert somewhat > > > from the RFC and implement support for Exhange's "Thread-Index" for > > > threading. Since Evo is being ported to Windows(r) I guess this is a > > > valid question. > > > > I don't really see what being ported to windows has to do with > > Thread-Index > > > > afaik, there's no plans to support Thread-Index altho that doesn't mean > > it won't happen. I have no idea. > > Nothing really, but I'm thinking that by porting Evo to Windows(r) there > would be a need to also have support for Exchange apart from the current > connector(?) > > And Thread-Index would be one of "Those" things. > > Say.. Gmails' conversations are also sort of not in the RFC right?
user interfaces aren't specified in IETF RFCs > In > that case, what's the official stance on Evo for supporting something > which isn't in the RFC. How particular is teh Evo team on compliance? as long as it doesn't break the RFCs... I guess it's fine. -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
