On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 14:35 +0200, guenther wrote: > The Junk filtering of Evo uses the well known and very good SA to flag > the mails. SA should identify most SPAMs out the box. However, results > get better, once the Bayesian classifier kicks in, which by default > needs to learn 200 messages each SPAM and HAM (non-Junk). So train > your > Bayes good... ;) > > ...guenther
Another good explanation, guenther. I always wondered what engine evo used for its spam filter. That amount of training would explain why I see the same HAM marked as spam again and again. I'm thinking, why is evo just not getting it that this sender is good? Now, I have some insight that it doesn't just store any given address as "not junk" it filters with more complexity than that. So, that raises the question: How can I create a "whitelist" of senders so not to wait a long time for the bayesian filtering to kick in? Gavin. _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
