If the original mail with the matching message-id is still in the same mailbox, there's no reason it shouldn't thread. Unless there is something else going on.
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 10:32 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: > I just replied to a message on an internal mailing list that I'm > subscribed to at work. I used the reply to all button, then I deleted > the OP's email from "to" (because he's on the list as well), and then > moved the list email from "cc" to "to". > > Because I get my own posts from this list, I would expect it would be > threaded under the OP's email in my inbox, but instead it appeared by > itself. > > I had a look at the "email source". The OP contains > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > and my reply contains > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > so obviously evolution understands both the OP's style of threading and > its own (good :) > > so why didn't it "thread"? I have the correct view, because other > messages in my inbox are "threaded", ie. indented one below the other, > but this one isn't. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated, > TIA, _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
